Investigations into lasting power of attorney up by 45%

Investigations into the actions of those given the responsibility to make financial decisions on an individual's behalf have soared.

The number of investigations into the actions of attorneys and deputies who have been given the responsibility to manage an individual’s finances or make decisions on their behalf has soared by 45 per cent in the past year.

This is according to a Freedom Information request to the Office of the Public Guardian by Royal London. It revealed that the number of investigations into the actions of attorneys and deputies rocketed from 1,199 in 2016/17 to 1,729 in 2017/18.

Under lasting power of attorney (LPA) agreements, attorneys are given the responsibility to manage a named individual’s personal and financial affairs should they lose the mental capacity to do it themselves. Deputies are appointed by the Court of Protection if an individual loses mental capacity without an LPA being agreed.

There are two types of LPA– one covering property and financial affairs and the second covering decisions around health and wellbeing.

Individuals are more likely to arrange LPAs for the former, with almost 1.6 million agreements covering property and financial affairs and just 732,000 for health and wellbeing.

However, Royal London claims that the level of investigations into people who are being trusted to manage another person’s affairs suggests that many do not understand what they can and cannot do under the agreement.

Helen Morrissey, personal finance specialist at Royal London, says: ‘When done properly, the attorney fulfils a vital role in safeguarding the interests of the person they are acting for. However, the sheer number of investigations into the actions of attorneys is concerning and action needs to be taken to curb poor practice.’

She adds: ‘While there have been instances where people appointed as attorneys have used their position to steal money from the person they are acting for, there are also instances where the attorney has unwittingly stepped beyond the boundaries of their responsibilities or have neglected to keep up to date records explaining what they have done and why. People taking on these responsibilities need clearer guidance on what they can and cannot do.’

This article was originally written by our sister publication Moneywise.

Subscribe to Money Observer Magazine

Be the first to receive expert investment news and analysis of shares, funds, regions and strategies we expect to deliver top returns, plus free access to the digital issues on your desktop or via the Money Observer App.

Subscribe now

Add new comment