Have markets grown used to Trump’s showmanship?

Markets have remained stable following the chaotic G7 summit, says Donald Maxwell-Scott of Rowan Dartington.

June 14, 2018

You need not have read or seen the news over the weekend, but you would have got the gist of how well the G7 summit went from one photograph. It was the photo of several G7 leaders standing round a table looking at Donald Trump who was sat down with his arms crossed. It was a scene that most people will be familiar with, that is if you have ever seen parents scolding a petulant child.
 
However, this should not be seen as a barb to Donald Trump, as I’m sure many parents will testify, sometimes the only way to resolve the situation is to give them what they want. If you can’t reason with him then it leaves very little room to manoeuvre. This could well be a smart move by Donald Trump. World leaders are generally not used to conducting business with someone who is so unwilling to negotiate. It is either Trumps way or no way. Of course, the EU has retaliated with the implementation of several retaliatory tariffs.
 
The US runs a huge trade deficit, therefore they do have a lot of clout to swing in any trade war. In 2016 the US deficit with the EU was $147 billion. While the EU is their largest trading partner, the US also runs deficits with Canada and Mexico. An EU tariff on Harley Davidsons and Bourbon is hardly going to scratch the surface, but what it almost certainly will accomplish is angering Mr Trump which could leave him implementing further and wider reaching tariffs on the EU.
 
The US might be rattling the sabre, but we find ourselves agreeing with Theresa May when she asked for calm before implementing any retaliatory measures. The US does have some legitimate gripes around trade and other matters. Much of Donald Trump’s focus seemed to be on the dairy tariff implemented by Canada. Canada does actually impose a 270 per cent tariff on milk, and this is while the US dairy industry continues to suffer from continuous overproduction resulting in US farmers dumping over 100 million gallons of surplus milk last year. With many US dairy farmers entering insolvency some would say Donald Trump does have a point.

-Global fund managers flock to US equities, tip S&P 500 to reach 3000
 
His other main gripe is on defence spending of America’s closest allies, or lack thereof, especially those countries within NATO. The US does have the largest defence budget in the world so it does make up the majority of spending within NATO, and other countries within NATO are not meeting the 2 per cent of GDP spending requirement on defence. Donald Trump’s argument is that EU countries are overly reliant on US defence and so they see little need in spending their own money. Again, there is an element of truth in this, especially when facing an increasingly hostile Russia.
 
While Mr Trump might have some legitimate points that need addressing, a trade war is not how you resolve these. As David Cameron will testify, negotiating with the EU is not the easiest job but open dialogue with your largest trading partner has to be better than a trade war which will have a negative economic impact on all those who partake in it.
 
However, despite the chaos of the G7 summit there are signs that the markets are growing used to Mr Trump’s sense of showmanship and have largely shrugged of the chaotic G7 summit with European markets in positive territory on Monday.

Plastic not so fantastic

One of the proposals of the G7 summit was to agree to an ocean plastics charter. The US and Japan declined to put their names on the charter. In what has been dubbed the ‘Blue Planet effect’ everyone is seeing the damage that plastics are doing to our oceans. This is good news, and any reduction in plastic usage coupled with more environmentally friendly alternatives will be welcome by everyone, not least by the environment. Plastic manufacturers are understandably concerned, however, despite potential regulatory headwinds many are still performing well, though their share price might not reflect this.  
 
Tougher regulations usually mean a tougher trading environment. No company wants a government or regulatory body imposing rules which may affect their business, and when they do it often leaves investors in those companies scrabbling for the exit. However, we believe this is often the wrong strategy. Regulatory headwinds are often part and parcel of doing business. Regulations are often a corrective measure of something that has gone unnoticed previously and in some cases, can actually improve how a business operates. Of course, not all regulations are necessarily beneficial; some may have a detrimental impact on future business, and then there is the cost of implementing these regulations. However, what investors also tend to forget is regulations often act as a good barrier to entry, thus preserving existing market share.
 
It is often beneficial to look past any regulatory headwinds and look at the broader investment landscape. A good example is the tobacco industry which has faced continual regulatory crackdowns, not just over the last few years, but over the last few decades. They have faced advertising bans across television, magazines and radio. As well as having written warnings on their products they now have a collection of pictures illustrating the dangers. All this coupled with tax increases for smokers every year in the budget. It’s easy to see why investors not worried about the ethical implications of investing in tobacco would be concerned. However, these regulations have preserved their market share. Imagine trying to create a new business selling tobacco products, how would you advertise your product and get it to market? Despite recent tobacco weakness, over the last twenty years it has been a remarkably good investment. Plastic may well be the tobacco of today, despite the dangers to the environment it may well be a habit that is too hard for us to kick. The regulatory headwinds should be seen as an opportunity for plastic manufactures to spend more on research and development so there is better recycling and better plastics available, while hopefully cutting out single use plastics all together.

Donald Maxwell-Scot is technical investment manager at Rowan Dartington

-A trade war between the US and China would be bad for everyone

 

Subscribe to Money Observer Magazine

Be the first to receive expert investment news and analysis of shares, funds, regions and strategies we expect to deliver top returns, plus free access to the digital issues on your desktop or via the Money Observer App.

Subscribe now

Add new comment