Share Sleuth: another trade continues spell of portfolio tweaks

Richard Beddard adds to the holding in Quatrix, although he still has doubts about the insurer side of the business.

In what must be the most active start to a year in Share Sleuth’s near 10-year history, I have traded for a third time in 2019, swapping a fraction of the portfolio’s holding in Solid State for a small shareholding in Quartix.

Solid State, a manufacturer of electronic equipment and component distributor, has recently acquired Pacer Technologies, but I have yet to make my mind up about the transaction. Acquisitions are a central part of the company’s strategy, and for years it has promised a big one, valued at over £5 million, so I suppose we should not be surprised now it has happened. There is usually more competition to buy bigger businesses, and as might be expected Solid State has paid a higher multiple of Pacer’s annual profit than it did for its smaller acquisitions. It says Pacer will give the group footholds in the US and in the market for medical equipment, as well as a brand new factory.

The trade, however, was triggered because Share Sleuth’s holding had grown to over £10,000, about 9% of its total value. To keep the portfolio well balanced, I reduced its stake in Solid State by 854 shares at a share price of 411p, the actual price quoted by a stockbroker, raising just shy of £3,500 after deducting £10 in lieu of broker fees. Now it accounts for 6% of the portfolio’s value.

I added 1,085 shares in Quartix, which provides a vehicle tracking service. The share price was 257p. Including £10 in lieu of broker fees, the total transaction cost almost £2,800, 2.5% of the portfolio’s total value. A trade size of 2.5% is my minimum.

There is a reason I went with the minimum even though I had more cash to burn. While I feel confident in Quartix’s long-term prosperity, I feel more ambivalent about the short term.

Active quarter for trading

A graph showing the performance of Share Sleuth April 2019

Fleets vs insurers

Quartix has two kinds of customer. The first is fleet operators, typically small fleets of a dozen or so vans operated by local businesses. The trackers send information about the vehicles back to the fleet manager to ensure they are being driven safely and efficiently. It’s a highly profitable business, growing almost like clockwork, mostly through direct sales of the low-cost service which earns Quartix a monthly fee.

The beauty of it is that there are millions of small businesses, so it has a large and growing customer base all using the same system. Quartix has a small but profitable operation in France and a loss-making start-up in the US. Both are growing faster than the UK operation, which was established in 2001. It has just launched in Spain and Poland as well.

The other customers are insurers. Typically, insurers buy the tracking service to monitor young drivers during their first year of motoring. These customers are not ‘sticky’ like fleet operators, and competition for their business is more intense. The market is less profitable, and Quartix is withdrawing from it.

Revenue and profit from insurers is falling as revenue and profit from fleets is growing. In the year to December 2018, Quartix installed 29% fewer units for insurers, while it installed 17% more units than it did the previous year in fleets. Moreover, the fleet operation is bigger, earning three-quarters of total revenue in the year to December 2018. Even so, Quartix, which is valued on a growth multiple of about 17 times adjusted profit, might contract in 2019.

I have been following Quartix for about two years, trying to make sense of the dynamics of its two contrary lines of business. Friends are wondering whether I have pulled the trigger too soon. We agree the fleet business is attractive but why not wait, they say, until the insurers are no longer shackling its growth. By then, I fear, Quartix’s quality will be apparent, and its valuation will have risen back to levels I cannot justify.

Trimming back Solid State

Portfolio     Cost (£) Value (£) Return (%)
Cash       2,900  
Shares       109,557  
Since 9 September 2009     30,000 112,458 275
           
Companies   Shares Cost (£) Value (£) Return (%)
ALU Alumasc 938 999 1,065 7
AVON Avon Rubber 192 2,510 2,362 -6
CFX Colefax 434 943 2,155 129
CGS Castings 1,109 3,110 4,020 29
CHH Churchill China 341 3,751 4,263 14
CHRT Cohort 1,600 3,747 6,000 60
DTG Dart 456 250 3,894 1,458
DWHT Dewhurst 735 2,244 6,615 195
GAW Games Workshop 198 568 6,148 983
GDWN Goodwin 266 6,646 8,007 20
HWDN Howden Joinery 748 3,228 3,684 14
JDG Judges Scientific 252 5,989 7,182 20
NXT Next 45 2,199 2,342 6
PMP Portmeirion 349 3,212 3,909 22
QTX Quartix 1,085 2,798 2,604 -7
RSW Renishaw 92 1,739 4,011 131
SAG Science 2,660 2,908 5,453 88
SOLI Solid State 1,546 4,523 6,524 44
SYS1 System1 463 1,793 949 -47
TET Treatt 1,222 1,734 5,102 194
TFW Thorpe (F W) 2,000 2,207 6,240 183
TRI Trifast 2,261 3,357 4,285 28
TSTL Tristel 750 268 2,269 746
VCT Victrex 150 2,253 3,561 58
XPP XP Power 339 6,287 6,916 10

Notes: New additions. Transaction costs include £10 broker fee, and 0.5% stamp duty where appropriate. Cash earns no interest. Dividends and sale proceeds are credited to the cash balance. £30,000 invested on 9 September 2009 would be worth £112,458 today. £30,000 invested in FTSE All-Share index tracker accumulation units would be worth £62,700 today. Objective: To beat the index tracker handsomely over five-year periods. Source: SharePad, 5 March 2019.

 

Subscribe to Money Observer Magazine

Be the first to receive expert investment news and analysis of shares, funds, regions and strategies we expect to deliver top returns, plus free access to the digital issues on your desktop or via the Money Observer App.

Subscribe now

Add new comment